My recent report about sketchy Facebook pages revealed another case of shifting standards. 4 about the suspension and then restoration of a post that Facebook first said violated its community standards, then reversed course and said it did not. “Further proves my point,” former manager Mark Luckie tweeted Dec. Only weeks ago, the company provided a near-perfect demonstration of the need for an appeals system when it took down a post by former Facebook employee Mark Luckie accusing the company of having a “black people problem.” Facebook then restored the post without a real explanation for either action. But do you trust it to do that job fairly? The conclusion: Facebook needs to police its network better. The two new reports for the Senate Intelligence Committee, one from the research firm New Knowledge and the other from the University of Oxford’s Computational Propaganda Project, document how Facebook, as well as Google ( GOOG, GOOGL) and Twitter ( TWTR), ignored obvious signs of bad behavior during and after the 2016 elections. ![]() If not? People will have yet another reason to give the network less of their time and attention. If it works, it could provide a useful example for other web platforms. It’s also offered new reminders of the difficulty Facebook will face in ensuring such an appeals process will work both fairly and at scale. 15 post that Facebook will create its own Supreme Court, “an independent body, whose decisions would be transparent and binding,” to judge company decisions about postings that allegedly violate its rules.Ī subsequent month of bad news for the social network-made worse by two reports prepared for the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence about the success of Russian social media disinformation campaigns-has only made this goal of accountability more important. And Zuckerberg can’t help you there.Zuckerberg wrote in a lengthy Nov. What a crushed heart really needs is willpower and a new love interest. The fact that there are apps which will block us dialling our exes’ numbers, without us having to delete the numbers altogether from our phones, doesn’t stop us deleting the app instead. Sure, I could block, or unfriend, or unfollow, or avoid, or use Facebook’s new tools to help me not look at my colleague Alex Hern’s social media profiles – but that won’t stop me, drunk at 4am, manually undoing all of the above and declaring my love for him. The problem, of course, is that man’s mind is mightier than machines, and our hearts mightier than our minds. “We hope these tools will help people end relationships on Facebook with greater ease, comfort and sense of control.” The tools can be accessed via the help centre, and presumably are reversible (though the blog post does not elaborate).įacebook already offers tools to limit what other individuals can view (including tailoring viewing permissions for individual posts and photographs) but it seems the new measures aim to be more discreet.įacebook product manager, Kelly Winters, writes that the trial tools are “part of our ongoing effort to develop resources for people who may be going through difficult moments in their lives. The new tools, packaged as “take a break”, are being trialled on mobile in the US, with a potential wider rollout based on feedback. ![]() ![]() On the flip side, users worried about still attached exes will also be able to limit the information an ex sees about them – including photos, videos and status updates. Photograph: FacebookĪ post on Facebook’s newsroom blog explains that a former partner’s posts will be hidden in News Feed and their name not automatically suggested for tagging in photos or messages. Facebook’s new ‘take a break’ tools – which aim to help with heartbreak.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |